A momentum test

I had a chance to play around with momentum strategies on 58 shares I had data for.

The basic strategy I had in mind was to buy at a 52w high, and sell at a 52w low. I also combined it with other ideas, such as looking for gap downs and gap ups. Here is a table I came up with:

 24 WIN LO-T + HI-T
 25 WIN GUP_T + GDN_T
 26 WIN HI-T|GUP_T + LO-T|GDN_T
 28 WIN HI-T + GDN_T
 28 WIN HI-T + LO-T|GDN_T
 29 WIN GUP_T + LO-T
 33 WIN HI-T|GUP_T + LO-T
 35 WIN HI-T + LO-T

The bit before the “+” is the buy criteria, and the bit after is the sell criteria. LO-T means 52w low, HI-T meams 52w high, GDN_T means a gap down of more than 10%, and GUP_T is a gap up.

We can see that a very simple stategy: buying at 52w highs and selling at 52w lows (the last row), is the best stategy, beating a simple buy-and-hold in 35 cases out of 58.

The worst strategy is the opposite: buying lows, and selling highs. Mixing in other criteria did not seem to help.

Looking at the best category, the mean relative return over approx 9 years was 1.343, which equates to an annual outperformance of about 3.3%.

It’s OK, but hardly outstanding.

Possible criticisms of my approach are that:

  1. the data set is too small
  2. I am data-mining by choosing only the best category
  3. the data may be inaccurate
  4. my calculations might actually be wrong
  5. there may be some size effect

As an example, I get the following buy/sell signals for CHG (Chemring) over the last 9 years:

BUY 2008-02-01 1991.03 2008-02-01 1991.03 1.000 HI-T 2007-03-06 1490.86 0.749 LO-F
SELL 2008-10-10 1652.91 2008-06-09 2229.28 1.349 HI-F 2008-10-10 1652.91 1.000 LO-T

BUY 2009-09-16 2061.10 2009-09-16 2061.10 1.000 HI-T 2008-10-29 1375.23 0.667 LO-F
SELL 2011-03-28 645.13 2010-04-29 3208.59 4.974 HI-F 2011-03-28 645.13 1.000 LO-T

Scale factor is: 0.259848119387965
 Non-momo price gain is: 1792.18, 167.50, 0.0934615942595052
 WIN HI-T + LO-T
 RELSCALE HI-T + LO-T 2.7802662842073

It turns out that this was a fairly disasterous share. The robot, for example, buys at 2016.1p, and sells at 645.1p. Ouch. The “scale factor” for the share, 0.2598, means that the robot turn £1 into 26p. Obviously, that’s “not ideal”. It is better than a buy-and-hold approach, though, where you would have lost over 90% of your money.

I conclude that you can’t apply that momentum strategy on just any share. In CHG’s case, the robot bought into quite a collosal uptrend and was tricked into buying what was effectively a bull trap.

I think the shares are in a better place now. They have lost 57% over 5 years, but it looks like that momentum may be reversing. My hunch is that’s the kind of situations to watch out for.

Here’s the robot’s decisions on Barclays:

BUY 2009-10-14 354.35 2009-10-14 354.35 1.000 HI-T 2009-01-23 47.30 0.133 LO-F
 SELL 2010-07-01 235.88 2009-10-14 354.35 1.502 HI-F 2010-07-01 235.88 1.000 LO-T

BUY 2012-12-17 237.31 2012-12-17 237.31 1.000 HI-T 2012-07-25 139.07 0.586 LO-F
 SELL 2014-03-03 247.85 2013-05-22 308.39 1.244 HI-F 2014-03-03 247.85 1.000 LO-T

BUY 2015-02-23 262.85 2015-02-23 262.85 1.000 HI-T 2014-07-11 207.90 0.791 LO-F
 SELL 2015-11-20 221.90 2015-07-31 288.95 1.302 HI-F 2015-11-20 221.90 1.000 LO-T

BUY 2016-12-07 234.85 2016-12-07 234.85 1.000 HI-T 2016-06-27 127.20 0.542 LO-F
 HOLD 233.10
 Scale factor is: 0.582549180700322
 Non-momo price gain is: 513.60, 233.10, 0.453855140186916
 WIN HI-T + LO-T
 RELSCALE HI-T + LO-T 1.2835575255585

The basic problem with Barclays is that the shares have been range-bound since about 2009. That is an extraordinary long time. Momentum strategies like a good strong trend to them (you don’t say!), and it can’t do well with prolonged sideways movements. BARC is not unique in having a sideways trend for a number of years – although it is perhaps unique for the sheer length of time it has been moving sideways. Look at the EZJ chart. you can see it traded sideways from 2008-2011. The problem is, there does not seem to be any way to know in advance if a sideways movement is about to be entered or exited.

So, in conclusion, I don’t think momentum is the panacea. You have to apply it judiciously.

Stay safe out there.

Advertisements

About mcturra2000

Computer programmer living in Scotland.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s